Quality Investor

Seneca Foods Corporation

Rank #433Op. Leverage

SENEA · Nasdaq · Consumer Defensive

Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) — Rank #433 by gross profitability (GP/assets 0.12) · ROE 5.3% · Piotroski F-Score 7 / 9.

As-of 2026-09-15 · CIK 0000088948 · all metrics point-in-time as of the filing date.

About

Seneca Foods Corporation provides packaged fruits and vegetables in the United States and internationally.

Show more

The company offers canned, frozen, and jarred fruits and vegetables; and packaged snack chips and other food products under the private label, as well as under various national and regional brands that the company owns or licenses, including Aunt Nellie's, CherryMan, Green Giant, Green Valley, Libby's, READ, and Seneca. In addition, it packs canned and frozen vegetables. Further, the company engages in the sale of cans, ends, and seeds, as well as aircraft operations. It provides its products to grocery outlets, including supermarkets, mass merchandisers, limited assortment stores, club stores, and dollar stores; specialty retailers; and food service distributors, restaurant chains, industrial markets, other food packagers, and export customers in approximately 55 countries, as well as federal, state, and local governments for school and other feeding programs.

Seneca Foods Corporation was incorporated in 1949 and is headquartered in Fairport, New York.

Industry
Packaged Foods
Sector
Consumer Defensive
State
NY
Filer Category
Accelerated filer
Fiscal Year End
March 31

Each fiscal year is read as-of that year’s own 10-K filing, so nothing restated after the fact leaks backwards. Line items this filer never tagged are omitted. Hover or tap a badge for the diagnostic behind it.

USD in millions, except per-share (EPS) and percentage rows. Values are as originally filed; em-dash = not tagged in that year's filing.
Fiscal year end2018-03-31filed 2018-06-292017-03-31filed 2018-06-292016-03-31filed 2018-06-292014-03-31filed 2014-05-22

Figures are as originally filed with the SEC (point-in-time), not restated, so they can differ slightly from sites that show later-restated numbers. Why point-in-time?